javalimit.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the javalimit.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host javalimit.com. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is NetNames Operations Limited .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called cloudflare containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

knowing your wisdom's insufficience is yet a kind of omniscience home archives profile subscribe june 02, 2014 swift language on the swift language today, apple announced a new programming language, swift. swift is an oo language, with a scripting like syntax, static types, local type inference, value types, tuples and pattern matching. it's stateful, and pretty straight forward mix of features from javascript, groovy, scala, java, and c#. in good tradition with apple (and next), the language is extremely pragmatic and focusing on seamless integration with the existing platform. so it should be possible to mix objective-c and swift in the same application. this could turn out to be a major win for the language, just like objective-c was great in that it let you mix objective-c (the new language) with c (which had all the libraries). memory management it's arc (automatic reference counting) again. granted, arc is much nicer than the old new/free regime of objective-c, but so far from what we're used to expect in a modern language. especially with complex structures that easily come from some gui elements referring to model objects, which can easily lead to cycles in the object graph. value types swift has value types of sorts. whenever you assign a reference to an immutable variable using let x = <expr> as opposed to var x = <expr> , swift makes a semantic copy of the value being assigned, making the value immutable in the process. this copying recurses until the types (of generics and/or members) are of reference (a.k.a. mutable) type. this provides a relatively smooth path to introduce more immutability in a codebase; because mutable and immutable things of the same type can coexist. what is yet to be proven is how this translates into reality ... perhaps someone from the ocaml world (which also has a mix of mutable and immutable) can shed light on that. concurrency surprisingly, the reference manual mentions nothing about threads or processes or the like. so from the outset there's not concurrency story. imho, one of the hardest parts of writing apps is the concurrency which has many sources, but most notably concurrent gui updates and network activity. so initially, this looks a bit dissapointing, but maybe there is a way out. swift's value types and pattern matching might be a good combo to provide passing things from one thread to another. but as long as there is a strong undercurrent to provide backwards compatability and integration with objective-c as it is, this will be very hard to accomplish as far as i can see. there is only one way to do concurrency right: isolation. just like rust or erlang has it, each process needs a separate memory space, and shared data needs to be 100% controlled by the system. it's the only thing that i have seen which works. posted at 10:44 pm | permalink | comments (0) | trackback (0) tags: apple, java, swiftlang | reblog (0) may 21, 2013 how could it go so bad? this past weekend i’ve been reading roubini and mihm’s crisis economics , a worthwhile read if you’d like to understand what went wrong . i’m “just an ordinary guy” when it comes to international-scale economics; and like most people probably — i’ve been baffled by what the financial crisis that peaked in the fall of 2008 was really about. this book is a great and neutral exposition of what really happened and what we should do about it. what happened? the first two thirds of the book is a history lesson on what happened, a parallel tale of 1929 and 2008. the last part talks about what we should do about it, and how the concequences of the us’s enoumous current trade deficit may unfold. the latter part is the more interesting of course. the authors make it very clear that the crisis is not directly the fault of the individual actors in the financial system; it’s the system itself that is fundamentally broken. one central principle that was broken in the recent crisis was that central banks bailed out (a) financial institutions that were not just illiquid but they were also insolvent, and (b) they also bailed out non-banks. both represent moral hazards, as it may cause people to expect such bail outs in the future; even in non-bank financial institutions, which is likely to make them take risks they would not otherwise undertake. what should be done? the crisis is an eminent opportunity to change legislation. generally, the legislation need to guide system actor’s motivations and increase transparency. compensation in the financial sector should be restructured so as to value long-time gains rather than quick wins. the authors make it an explicit point to say that it is not necessarily the size of compensation which is the problem; it’s the structure. there needs to be more skin in the game . the fact that rating are payed for by the very institutions that are selling financial products, is fundamentally broken. imo, ratings should be provided to the public free of charge by truly independent bodies — national or supernational, and the more the merrier. until then, never trust an aaa rating again. derivatives need to be controlled. it’s absurd that the system alows anyone to buy cds’s “bankrupcy insurance” for a any 3rd party; even without having an equity interest in that party. it’s like buying fire insurance for your neighbours house ... which might motivate me to play around with some matches ... too-big-to-fail oriented legislation is bullshit; rules should apply to everyone. if anything, corporations that are too large to fail should be split up. the book contains many more suggestions for what could be done, the above are some of the more important ones it seems. what’s next? according to the authors it is inevitable that soon, the us’s status as the world’s primary economy will fade, and likely be replaced with a century with chinese dominance. the us dollar cannot continue to be the reference currency. hopefully this shift will happen in an orderly fashion, but if the us tries to devaluate the dollar by inducing too much inflation (reducing the value of treasury bonds) we might see a “run on the bank” out of the ordinary. conclusions great book. there’s a lot of “doom day” books out there, this is not one of them. it provides a solemn and trustworthy account of what happend and argues what we need to do. posted at 04:22 pm | permalink | comments (0) | trackback (0) | reblog (0) october 22, 2012 consistency eventualis here is just a short note on the unfortunate choice of name for the concept eventual consistency . to many non-native speaking people, it sounds like maybe consistent. many languages have a word derived from the latin word eventualis (german: eventuell, french: éventuel, danish: eventuelt, …) which in these languages literally means possibly or perhaps - a word used to denote something which may happen, or maybe not. for instance, we would use it in phrases such as [replace underlined word with with "our" version of eventual]: could you perhaps do me a favour? what do you think of the possibly fatal outcome? to an average dane, for instance, eventually fatal doesn't necessarily sound bad; likewise eventually wonderful is not necessarily good. this is of course very unfortunate us who want to promote eventual consistency as a tool to provide better scalability and availability in large-scale distributed systems. the term makes it sound flaky, or "perhapsy". "if you are lucky - and the planets all line up correctly - yes, then it will eventually be consistent." it just rings wrong. so, from now on i propose that we all call it delayed consistency , which at least to my ear sounds much more right. it sounds like we will eventually get there :-) posted at 11:47 pm | permalink | comments (1) | reblog (0) may 24, 2011 erlang is not a concurrent functional programming language whenever developers fall in love with erlang (as many tend to do these days) they are too often busy promoting it to their friends and colleagues as a c

URL analysis for javalimit.com

http://www.javalimit.com/2013/05/how-could-it-go-so-bad.html
http://www.javalimit.com/2010/11/erjang-receives-erlang-user-of-the-year-2010.html
http://www.javalimit.com/2011/05/erlang-is-not-a-concurrent-functional-programming-language.html?cid=6a00d83455f7ed69e2014e88a9213a970d#comment-6a00d83455f7ed69e2014e88a9213a970d
http://www.javalimit.com/archives.html
http://www.javalimit.com/current-talks.html
http://www.javalimit.com/2010/11/erjang-interpreted.html
http://www.javalimit.com/2010/11/erjang-receives-erlang-user-of-the-year-2010.html#comments
http://www.javalimit.com/2011/05/erlang-is-not-a-concurrent-functional-programming-language.html#comments
http://www.javalimit.com/2010/10/goto-top-20-talks.html#comments
http://www.javalimit.com/2011/05/erlang-is-not-a-concurrent-functional-programming-language.html?cid=6a00d83455f7ed69e2014e88ae788b970d#comment-6a00d83455f7ed69e2014e88ae788b970d
http://www.javalimit.com/2011/04/using-to-index-riak-objects.html#comments
http://www.javalimit.com/2014/06/swift-language.html
http://www.javalimit.com/2011/05/erlang-is-not-a-concurrent-functional-programming-language.html
http://www.javalimit.com/2014/06/swift-language.html#trackback
http://www.javalimit.com/2012/10/consistency-eventualis.html#comments

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: JAVALIMIT.COM
Registry Domain ID: 583492902_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.ascio.com
Registrar URL: http://www.ascio.com
Updated Date: 2017-09-07T07:25:52Z
Creation Date: 2006-09-06T16:15:31Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-09-06T16:15:31Z
Registrar: Ascio Technologies, Inc. Danmark - Filial af Ascio technologies, Inc. USA
Registrar IANA ID: 106
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +442070159370
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Name Server: NS1.ASCIO.NET
Name Server: NS2.ASCIO.NET
Name Server: NS3.ASCIO.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2017-09-22T15:51:28Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR Ascio Technologies, Inc. Danmark - Filial af Ascio technologies, Inc. USA

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =javalimit.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME javalimit.com

  CHANGED 2017-09-07

  CREATED 2006-09-06

STATUS
ok https://icann.org/epp#ok

NSERVER

  NS1.ASCIO.NET 185.83.100.41

  NS2.ASCIO.NET 185.83.102.42

  NS3.ASCIO.NET 185.83.100.43

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .